Legal Opinion

Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 30, 2009No. 08-354CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HORN, Judge.

FINDINGS OF FACT

Plaintiffs, the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community1 (hereinafter, the Community) and 495 individual members of the Community, individually and as a proposed class,2 seek money damages from the United *608States Western Area Power Administration (WAPA) for breach of a “Contract and Grant of Easement.” The “Contract and Grant of Easement,” made pursuant to an Act of Congress approved June 17, 1902 (Pub.L. No. 57-161, ch. 1093, 32 Stat. 388 (1902)), is dated August 1,1949 and was entered into between the United States and the Indian Allotees and owners of…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Postal Holdings, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  2. Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  3. Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  4. Kenneth Earman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  5. System Planning Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API