Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HORN, Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Plaintiffs, the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community1 (hereinafter, the Community) and 495 individual members of the Community, individually and as a proposed class,2 seek money damages from the United *608States Western Area Power Administration (WAPA) for breach of a “Contract and Grant of Easement.” The “Contract and Grant of Easement,” made pursuant to an Act of Congress approved June 17, 1902 (Pub.L. No. 57-161, ch. 1093, 32 Stat. 388 (1902)), is dated August 1,1949 and was entered into between the United States and the Indian Allotees and owners of…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cohen v. Postal Holdings, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Kenneth Earman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- System Planning Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.