Nesselrode v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Tucker Act; 28 U.S.C. § 1491; Fro Se Plaintiff; Motion to Dismiss; RCFC 12(b)(1); RCFC 12(b)(6); Res Judicata; Civil Fraud; Student Loan Default
OPINION AND ORDER
MARGARET M. SWEENEY, Judge
Before the court are (1) plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), (2) plaintiffs motion for judgment, (3) defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs first amended complaint, (4) plaintiffs motion to strike defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs first amended complaint, and (5) plaintiffs motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. For the reasons set forth below, the court grants…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Seh Ahn Lee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Parker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Dixon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- MOHN v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- Maldonado v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.