Legal Opinion

Nesselrode v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 13, 2016No. 16-26CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tucker Act; 28 U.S.C. § 1491; Fro Se Plaintiff; Motion to Dismiss; RCFC 12(b)(1); RCFC 12(b)(6); Res Judicata; Civil Fraud; Student Loan Default

OPINION AND ORDER

MARGARET M. SWEENEY, Judge

Before the court are (1) plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), (2) plaintiffs motion for judgment, (3) defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs first amended complaint, (4) plaintiffs motion to strike defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs first amended complaint, and (5) plaintiffs motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. For the reasons set forth below, the court grants…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Seh Ahn Lee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  2. Parker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  3. Dixon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
  4. MOHN v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. Maldonado v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API