Legal Opinion
Hartford Fire Insurance v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided October 22, 2012No. 11-499CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*528 OPINION AND ORDER
BOHDAN A. FUTEY, Judge.
This case comes before the Court on defendant’s Motion to Dismiss.
On August 2, 2011, plaintiff Hartford Fire Insurance Company (“Hartford”), a Connecticut corporation with its principal place of business in Hartford, Connecticut, filed a complaint in the Court of Federal Claims against the United States, acting specifically through the United States Army Corps of Engineers (“the Corps”). The complaint alleged the Corps wrongfully disbursed funds to Overstreet Electric Co. (“Overstreet”), a contractor for whom Hartford had acted as a Miller Act surety…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Pearlman v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Colonial Surety Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Phila. Indem. Ins. Co. v. Ohana Control Sys., Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2018
- Capitol Indemnity Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Capitol Indemnity Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- In Re: LTC Holdings, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.