Legal Opinion
Carahsoft Technology Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 12, 2009No. 08-646 CPublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion and Order
BLOCK, Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This is a post-award bid protest. Plaintiff, Carahsoft Technology Corporation (“Carah-soft”), challenges the Government Accountability Office’s (“GAO”) award of a contract to intervenor, Monster Government Solutions (“Monster”), for the procurement of an automated recruitment system. In its complaint, plaintiff alleges that this award was unreasonable and contrary to law. Plaintiff also asserts that GAO and Monster willfully conspired to violate the Competition in Contracting Act of 1984 (“CICA”). Plaintiff asks the court to permanently enjoin…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Tech Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- MORI Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Supreme Foodservice Gmbh v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- CBY Design Builders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Allied Technology Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.