Legal Opinion

Frager v. Tomlinson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1953No. 9325-aPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRudolph, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages to his automobile which were sustained when a car owned by the defendant and driven by defendant’s brother ran into plaintiff’s car. Defendant counterclaimed for damages to his car. The jury returned a verdict which allowed neither plaintiff nor defendant to recover damages. Defendant has appealed.

The facts are as follows: Plaintiff together with his wife and baby were traveling east on Highway 18. It was snowing and blowing and the highway was extremely heavy. Plaintiff was following another car which was breaking a track through the snow.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Larkins v. KohlmeyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Geisen v. LuceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. Federal Land Bank of Omaha v. HouckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  4. McCleod v. Tri-State Milling Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Rath v. BankstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Albers v. OttenbacherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Mid-America Marketing Corp. v. Dakota Industries, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Lenius v. KingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Barnhart v. AhlersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Corey v. KocerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API