Legal Opinion

Rath v. Bankston

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 17, 1929No. Docket No. 6238PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNELL, J., pro tem.

The plaintiff herein appeals from a judgment for the defendants in an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by reason of a collision between the automobile in which she was riding as a guest and a truck and trailer owned and operated by defendants.

The accident occurred at about 4:30 A. M. of March 7, 1925. Appellant, a young woman, had gone out for a drive with one Clarence Plabecker. Starting from Los Angeles at about 8 o’clock in the evening of the preceding day they had driven to Santa Monica in Habecker’s touring car and to a point somewhere on the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Thompson v. Los Angeles & San Diego Beach Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Berkovitz v. American River Gravel Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Bryant v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Harris v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Ornales v. WiggerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Whitechat v. GuyetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Mecchi v. Lyon Van & Storage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API