Legal Opinion
Geisen v. Luce
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 11, 1932No. Nos. 28,814, 28,821PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
Defendant Luce appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial. Defendant Ferris appealed from an order denying his alternative motion for judgment non obstante or a new trial.
In March, 1930, Mr. Ferris Avith his invalid Avife and tAvo other ladies drove his three-ton Cadillac car northerly on paved trunk highway No. 3 going toward Winona. The frost Avas coming out of the ground, and the shoulders Avere soft. They had been constructed in 1929. The condenser burned out, and the car came to a stop. It Avas disabled. It came to a standstill substantially on the right-hand side of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Powers v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
- Martin v. Oregon Stages, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Dare v. BossOregon Supreme Court · 1924
- Billingsley v. McCormick Transfer Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- Colvin v. Auto Interurban Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Medved v. DoolittleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Hayes Freight Lines, Inc. v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1948
- Jarosh v. Van MeterNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
- Greenfield v. BruskasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- Smith v. SharpIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.