Legal Opinion

McCleod v. Tri-State Milling Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1946No. File No. 8784PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

This is an action brought by John M. McCleod as special administrator against the Tri-State Milling Company to recover damages for the death of his son John, four years of age, who was drowned on June 4, 1943, in a canal maintained by the defendant.

There is no substantial conflict in the evidence. From the record, it appears that an ordinance known in the record as “Exhibit 1” was enacted in August, 1889, by the city council of Rapid City granting to the Rapid River Milling Company the right to excavate a canal across arid along the streets therein named. It requires that the canal “be boxed…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Hayes v. Michigan Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Peters v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Taylor v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Sluder v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Yowell v. Piper Aircraft Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Hedges v. ConderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  3. Walz v. City of HudsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Albers v. OttenbacherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Larson v. Heintz Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API