Alvarez v. Retail Credit Ass'n
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.
This is an action for damages for the wrongful institution of a civil action and the attachment of the plaintiff’s wages by the defendant collection agency. Prom a judgment for the plaintiff, the defendant appeals.
The assignments of error all challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict.
The facts may be outlined briefly as follows: The plaintiff, Alvarez, was notified by the defendant Retail Credit that a bill for services furnished by Portland General Electric Company had been assigned to Retail Credit for collection. Alvarez, in person, as well as by telephone, advised…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Timmins v. HaleOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Eitel v. Times, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Kuhnhausen v. StadelmanOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- Hess v. Oregon Baking Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1897
- Carnation Lumber Co. v. McKenneyOregon Supreme Court · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Roop v. PARKER NORTHWEST PAVING, CO.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- O'TOOLE v. FranklinOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Mantia v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Portland Trailer & Equipment, Inc. v. A-1 Freeman Moving & Storage, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Crouter v. United Adjusters, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.