Legal Opinion

Alvarez v. Retail Credit Ass'n

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1963PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

This is an action for damages for the wrongful institution of a civil action and the attachment of the plaintiff’s wages by the defendant collection agency. Prom a judgment for the plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

The assignments of error all challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict.

The facts may be outlined briefly as follows: The plaintiff, Alvarez, was notified by the defendant Retail Credit that a bill for services furnished by Portland General Electric Company had been assigned to Retail Credit for collection. Alvarez, in person, as well as by telephone, advised…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Timmins v. HaleOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Eitel v. Times, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Kuhnhausen v. StadelmanOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Hess v. Oregon Baking Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Carnation Lumber Co. v. McKenneyOregon Supreme Court · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Roop v. PARKER NORTHWEST PAVING, CO.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. O'TOOLE v. FranklinOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Mantia v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. Portland Trailer & Equipment, Inc. v. A-1 Freeman Moving & Storage, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. Crouter v. United Adjusters, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API