O'TOOLE v. Franklin
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLinde, J.
I
In a number of recent decisions, this court has followed the "English rule,” first adopted in this state in 1896, that an action for the malicious prosecution of civil proceedings requires a showing of "special injury” beyond the trouble, cost, and other consequences normally associated with defending oneself against unfounded legal charges. Mitchell v. Silver Lake Lodge, 29 Or 294, 45 P 798 (1896) (wrongful attachment); Buck v. Gale, 271 Or 90, 530 P2d 1248 (1975), and cases there cited. The present appeal asks us to reconsider this rule.
The appeal is from an order sustaining a demurrer to…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Burt v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- McEvoy v. HeliksonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Ritter v. BEALSOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Schwartz v. SchwartzIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Friedman v. DozorcMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Beecy v. PucciarelliMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Brody v. RubySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- Chocktoot v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1977
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.