Legal Opinion

O'TOOLE v. Franklin

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1977No. TC 76-1447-L-3, SC 24761PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinde, J.

I

In a number of recent decisions, this court has followed the "English rule,” first adopted in this state in 1896, that an action for the malicious prosecution of civil proceedings requires a showing of "special injury” beyond the trouble, cost, and other consequences normally associated with defending oneself against unfounded legal charges. Mitchell v. Silver Lake Lodge, 29 Or 294, 45 P 798 (1896) (wrongful attachment); Buck v. Gale, 271 Or 90, 530 P2d 1248 (1975), and cases there cited. The present appeal asks us to reconsider this rule.

The appeal is from an order sustaining a demurrer to…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Burt v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. McEvoy v. HeliksonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Ritter v. BEALSOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Schwartz v. SchwartzIllinois Supreme Court · 1937

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Friedman v. DozorcMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Beecy v. PucciarelliMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Brody v. RubySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  5. Chocktoot v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1977

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API