Legal Opinion

Timmins v. Hale

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1927PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

This is an appeal from an order setting aside a judgment for plaintiff and granting a new trial to defendant. The action was for malicious prosecution and plaintiff had verdict and judgment for $10,230, $5,000 as general damages, $5,000 as exemplary damages and $230 as special damages. The order recites eight grounds upon which the action of this court was based, which we have numbered for our own convenience; these are:

“That in consequence of inadvertence to which the attention of the court was not called, and to which no exception was taken, the defendant has not had his cause properly…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hess v. Oregon Baking Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Archambeau v. EdmunsonOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Bottig v. PolskyOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  4. American National Bank v. KerleyOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Spokane County v. Pacific Bridge Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1923

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Honda Motor Co. v. ObergSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Hillman v. Northern Wasco County PUDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Van Lom v. SchneidermanOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Kuhnhausen v. StadelmanOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Alvarez v. Retail Credit Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1963

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API