Legal Opinion
Mantia v. Hanson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 13, 2003No. 99-12-13064; A112282PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.
Third-party plaintiff Darrel Hanson (Hanson) appeals from a judgment that (1) dismissed his claim for intentional interference with economic relations against third-party defendant Bailey, Pinney & Associates, LLC (the Bailey firm); (2) awarded the Bailey firm attorney fees under ORS 20.105 “and/or” ORCP 17 C and D; and (3) awarded enhanced prevailing party fees under ORS 20.190(3). Hanson contends, principally, that the court erred in concluding that his tortious interference claim was precluded by a defense of absolute privilege and that, in all events, the court erred in awarding attorney…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Top Service Body Shop, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Ramstead v. MorganOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Wallulis v. DymowskiOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Alvarez v. Retail Credit Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1963
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- The Estate of Richard A. Mayer, and Spangler, Jennings & Dougherty v. Lax, Inc., and David LascoIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Shumake v. FosheeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Cejas Commercial Interiors, Inc. v. Torres-LizamaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Patton v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2005
- In re the Marriage of NimanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.