Legal Opinion

State v. Horne

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 7, 1982No. 8225SC214PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Chief Judge.

On the first day of trial defendant filed a motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant issued two days after the alleged robberies. In her motion defendant alleged as grounds for suppression that the warrant was void and unconstitutional on its face and that no probable cause was established for its issuance. The trial court denied the motion, and defendant has assigned error. She asserts in her brief that the evidence seized should be suppressed because the warrant was not based on the personal observations of the applicant for the warrant, but was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. State v. HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. McQueenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. HurstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. CrainCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. HartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  4. State v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. HurstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API