Legal Opinion

State v. Wheeler

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 4, 1984No. 8324SC943PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Defendants first assign error to entry of judgment for two counts of armed robbery, contending that the evidence supports only a single conviction of armed robbery. The State’s evidence tended to show that defendants were armed with rifles when they entered the home of Frank and Mattie Brown. The Browns, both eighty years old, had been married for approximately 60 years at the time of the crime. While defendant Wheeler held the Browns at gunpoint, defendant Hammett wandered through the house, during which time Hammett drank some cough syrup that had been prescribed for Mrs.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. AhearnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. JerrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. ChatmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. StylesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  2. State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  3. State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. StylesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API