Legal Opinion

State v. Hurst

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 3, 1987No. 513PA86PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

We have allowed discretionary review to determine whether the defendant in this case may be convicted and sentenced for both armed robbery and felonious larceny when both charges are based on the same incident. The Court of Appeals held the defendant could not be so convicted and arrested the judgment of felonious larceny. We believe that State v. Murray, 310 N.C. 541, 313 S.E. 2d 523 (1984); State v. Beaty, 306 N.C. 491, 293 S.E. 2d 760 (1982); and State v. Revelle, 301 N.C. 153, 270 S.E. 2d 476 (1980), require that we reverse the Court of Appeals. Each of these cases holds or…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. State v. GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. WeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. MurraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. State v. JaynesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  3. State v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  4. State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  5. State v. SpencerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API