Legal Opinion

State v. Hurst

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 3, 1987No. 513PA86Published

1Opinion of the Court

359 S.E.2d 776 (1987)

320 N.C. 589

STATE of North Carolina

v.

Charles Alfred HURST.

No. 513PA86.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 3, 1987.

Lacy H. Thornburg, Atty. Gen. by Newton G. Pritchett, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for the State.

James R. Parish, Fayetteville, for defendant-appellee.

WEBB, Justice.

We have allowed discretionary review to determine whether the defendant in this case may be convicted and sentenced for both armed robbery and felonious larceny when both charges are based on the same incident. The Court of Appeals held the defendant could not be so convicted and arrested…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. State v. GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. WeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. MurraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API