Legal Opinion
In Re Garvey
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided March 6, 1997No. OSB 94-236, 94-237, 95-30; SC S42052PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
This is a lawyer disciplinary case in which a trial panel of the Disciplinary Board found the accused guilty of numerous violations of statutes and disciplinary rules and decided that disbarment is the appropriate sanction. Pursuant to ORS 9.536(3) and Rule of Procedure (BR) 10.6, this court is required to review the trial panel’s decision de novo. The accused neither made an appearance nor filed a brief in this court. The Oregon State Bar submitted the record and waived appearance. We disbar the accused.
FACTS
The accused did not respond to the formal complaint of the Oregon State Bar. 1…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MorinOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LeonhardtOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MilesOregon Supreme Court · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SheinbeinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CohenOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GustafsonOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of HuffmanOregon Supreme Court · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.