Legal Opinion

State v. Britt

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 7, 1989No. 8816SC518PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

In this child sexual abuse case defendant presents numerous assignments of error. We hold that the trial court erred in instructing the jury as to the first degree sexual offense and indecent liberties charges. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new trial on those charges; otherwise, we find no prejudicial error.

The evidence for the State tended to show the following: Defendant and his wife, Martha, separated on 9 December 1983 with Martha retaining custody of their 13 month old daughter Michelle. Michelle was born on 10 November 1982. In October 1984 Martha took her…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. TolleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. State v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HartnessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. State v. LoveCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. State v. GarvickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  4. State v. HinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API