Legal Opinion

State v. Garvick

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1990No. 893SC296PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

Defendant brings forward five assignments of error. In his first assignment of error, defendant contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress the results of the breathalyzer test. Defendant’s second assignment of error is that the trial court erred in denying expert status to defendant’s witness, Jonathan Pharr. Defendant’s third assignment of error is that the trial court erred by requiring defendant’s counsel to reveal the purpose of his cross-examination in the presence of the State’s witness. In his fourth assignment of error, defendant argues that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. CokerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. State v. HartnessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  3. State v. HowrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Raleigh Mobile Home Sales, Inc. v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  5. State v. GoodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. State v. BeckCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  3. State v. GodwinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API