Legal Opinion

State v. Hinson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 5, 1991No. 9025SC31PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

Defendant initially assigns as error the trial court’s failure to dismiss the charges against him. Defendant argues that the evidence was insufficient to convict him of first degree sexual offense on the grounds that he performed fellatio on the victim. We disagree.

On a motion to dismiss, the trial court must determine from all the evidence, taken in the light most favorable to the State, whether there is substantial evidence that the crime charged has been committed and that the accused is the one who did it. Substantial evidence is such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. RameySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. HartnessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  5. State v. BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. State v. SheffieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API