Legal Opinion

State v. Black

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 7, 1983No. 712A82PublishedCited by 138 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Chief Justice.

By the first assignment of error argued in his brief, defendant contends the trial court erred in permitting the prosecuting attorney to cross-examine him regarding his previous employment at an adult bookstore.

The trial transcript discloses the following with respect to the cross-examination of defendant:

Q: Do you recall working somewhere on Shelton Avenue?

A: Yes, sir, about four years ago.

Q: And where was that?

MR. BENBOW: Objection, that is not responsive to the question.

COURT: Overruled. Exception No. 7

A: That was the Adult Bookstore in Statesville.

Q: And what did you…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. United States v. Milton L. McCaskillCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  3. State v. BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. BelkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by138 opinions

  1. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  2. Dogwood Development & Management Co. LLC v. White Oak Transport Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  3. State v. StokesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  4. State v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  5. State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API