Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan
Petitioners in these cases were found guilty of criminal contempt by a jury, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. §401(3), for their *790violation of the District Court’s injunction prohibiting infringement of respondent’s trademark. They received sentences ranging from six months to five years.1 On appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, petitioners urged that the District Court erred in appointing respondent’s attorneys, rather than a disinterested attorney, to prosecute the contempt. The Court of Appeals affirmed, 780 F. 2d 179 (1985), and we granted certiorari, 477 U. S. 903 (1986). We now…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by759 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
754 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.