Legal Opinion
State v. Love
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided September 4, 1990No. 8910SC1254PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
In his first assignment of error defendant contends that the trial court erred in quashing subpoenas duces tecum upon Wake County Mental Health Center, Wake Medical Center, Wake County Department of Social Services, and Wake County Public Schools.
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-903(d) (1988) grants a defendant in a criminal case access as of right to documents and tangible objects that are “within the possession, custody or control of the State. . . However, the reports and records at issue in this case were not within the prosecutor’s possession, custody, or control; therefore, they were…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Otey v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bradley Woodcraft, Inc. v. BoddenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- State v. BurrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
- Reginald Jerome Love v. Aaron Johnson, Secretary of Correction Lacy Thornburg, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- State v. DewCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- Stark v. N.C. Department of Environment & Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.