Legal Opinion

California Insurance Guarantee Ass'n v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 6, 2012No. B231491PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ASHMANN-GERST, J.

Petitioner California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA) seeks review of a ruling by the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) that recognized claims asserted by real parties in interest Oracle Imaging, N-Care and Nations Surgery Center (collectively medical providers) as “covered” claims under Insurance Code section 1063.1.1 The claims were asserted by real party in interest Pinnacle Lien Services (Pinnacle) on behalf of the medical providers. CIGA contends that it has no obligation to pay because Pinnacle was an assignee of the claims and assigned claims are…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Garvey v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Isaacson v. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Nolan v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. MCI Commc'ns Servs., Inc. v. Cal. Dep't of Tax & Fee Admin., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Chorn v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Fink v. ShemtovCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Moreno v. QuemuelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Morgan v. Beaumont Police DepartmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API