Legal Opinion

Fink v. Shemtov

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 28, 2012No. G045856PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FYBEL, J.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff David Fink appeals after judgment was entered in favor of, inter alia, defendant S&E Stone, Inc. (S&E). Acting in propria persona, Fink filed a complaint against S&E and others, as the assignee of Stone Center Corporation’s (Stone Center) claims against them and litigated those claims through a bench trial. In a thorough statement of decision issued after the trial court granted S&E’s motion for judgment under Code of Civil Procedure section 631.8, the court found Stone Center and Fink’s assignment agreement to be void against public policy. The court…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Founding Members of Newport Beach Country Club v. Newport Beach Country Club, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1756, AFL-CIO v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Birbrower, Montalbano, Condon & Frank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Harrison v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board v. Handlery Hotel, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Orange Cnty. Water Dist. v. MAG Aerospace Indus., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. California Bank & Trust v. Piedmont Operating PartnershipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. 139 S. Occidental Blvd. v. Ha CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Dominguez v. Selene Finance, LPDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025
  5. Orange County Water Dist. v. MAG Aerospace IndustriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API