Fink v. Shemtov
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FYBEL, J.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff David Fink appeals after judgment was entered in favor of, inter alia, defendant S&E Stone, Inc. (S&E). Acting in propria persona, Fink filed a complaint against S&E and others, as the assignee of Stone Center Corporation’s (Stone Center) claims against them and litigated those claims through a bench trial. In a thorough statement of decision issued after the trial court granted S&E’s motion for judgment under Code of Civil Procedure section 631.8, the court found Stone Center and Fink’s assignment agreement to be void against public policy. The court…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Founding Members of Newport Beach Country Club v. Newport Beach Country Club, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1756, AFL-CIO v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Birbrower, Montalbano, Condon & Frank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Harrison v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board v. Handlery Hotel, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Orange Cnty. Water Dist. v. MAG Aerospace Indus., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- California Bank & Trust v. Piedmont Operating PartnershipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- 139 S. Occidental Blvd. v. Ha CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Dominguez v. Selene Finance, LPDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025
- Orange County Water Dist. v. MAG Aerospace IndustriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.