Legal Opinion

Moreno v. Quemuel

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 17, 2013No. B241998PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ASHMANN-GERST, Acting P. J.

We hold that when a peace officer opens his or her door as a precursor to exiting a patrol car and making contact with a motorist during a traffic stop, the peace officer is in “immediate pursuit of an actual or suspected violator of the law” for purposes of the immunity set forth in Vehicle Code section 17004. In that situation, the peace officer cannot be held liable for opening his or her door in the path of a motorcyclist and causing injury. Accordingly, we conclude that the trial court properly applied section 17004 when it granted summary judgment in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Goodman v. LozanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Harris v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Peake v. UnderwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Judge v. Nijjar Realty, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Estate of Manson CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. Gilliland v. City of PleasantonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
  5. Gilliland v. City of PleasantonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API