Legal Opinion

Drathman v. Cohen

California Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1903No. S.F. No. 2630PublishedCited by 17 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco granting a new trial. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is an action against the defendants to recover damages suffered by the plaintiff from the alleged negligence of the defendants. Answers were filed, and the ease tried by a jury, resulting in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, whereupon the defendants moved for a new trial, upon several grounds, among which was that of the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict. The court granted the motion upon that ground alone, and from the order granting the motion the plaintiff appeals.

In the granting of new trials, the trial court has much dis cretion in considering whether or not…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dawson v. SchlossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Stuart v. LordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. De Molera v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. American Type Founders' Co. v. PackerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Owen v. Pomona Land and Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Swift v. Occidental Mining & Petroleum Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Finkle v. TaitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. Morgan v. J. W. Robinson Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Hitchcock v. RooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API