Legal Opinion

Finkle v. Tait

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 29, 1921No. Civ. No. 3726PublishedCited by 43 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

The husband of Charlotte Pinkie was struck by an automobile which was being operated by Georgia Tait, receiving injuries from which he died almost immediately. The administratrix of his estate brought this action to recover damages, alleging that the automobile which caused the death of Pinkie was at the time being operated in a negligent manner and at a dangerous and excessive rate of speed. After hearing the testimony of the witnesses for plaintiff and defendants, the trial judge advised the jury to return a verdict in favor of the defendants, which verdict was thereafter recorded and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Scott v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Stephenson v. S. Pac. Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  3. In Re Estate of BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Diamond v. WeyerhaeuserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Niosi v. Empire Steam LaundryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. White v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Palmer v. TschudyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Burgesser v. Bullock'sCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Fischer v. KeenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Kalfus v. FrazeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API