Legal Opinion

Graham v. Ellmore

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 6, 1933No. Docket No. 692PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

This is an action for damages for fraud in a real estate transaction wherein the plaintiffs exchanged certain land in Oregon for an interest in certain land in Orange County owned by the defendant Ellmore. The defendant August Mennes was a real estate salesman in the employ of the defendant L. L. Mennes, who was a real estate broker. The defendant Indemnity Company had furnished a bond for the broker and salesman, under the provisions of the California Real Estate Act. The two last-named defendants had no connection with the matter out of which this case arose, other than this relationship to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hines v. BrodeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Maxson v. LlewelynCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Muller v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Stirnus v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Andrew v. Bankers & Shippers InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  3. Schonfeld v. City of VallejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Christiansen v. RoddyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Edwards v. LangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API