Legal Opinion
Christiansen v. Roddy
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 23, 1986No. F005088PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VARTABEDIAN, J.*
Judgment was entered after court trial below finding that appellants Willis Roddy (individually and doing business as Roddy Financial Services) and Eugene H. Files (individually and doing business as E. H. Files and Associates) negligently misrepresented the value of certain property securing a loan purchased by respondents David Christiansen, Frank and Sophie Mayer, and Sam and Betty Satariano. The statement of decision and judgment awarding damages were filed on November 7, 1984. The above named appellants filed notices of appeal on December 21, 1984, and January 3,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Williams v. PolgarMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Gray v. Don Miller & Associates, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marina View Heights Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Schroeder v. Auto Driveaway Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Walters v. MarlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Colaprico v. Sun Microsystems, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1991
- Gentry v. eBay, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- Michelson v. HamadaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Salahutdin v. Valley of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.