Legal Opinion

Maxson v. Llewelyn

California Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1898No. L. A. No. 352PublishedCited by 27 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. J. W. McKinley, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court'.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Plaintiff appeals from the judgment and from the order denying him a new trial. He brought his action against the defendant Llewelyn as maker, and defendant George Larrabee as indorser, to recover upon a negotiable instrument in the form of a check.

Larrabee was a special or soliciting agent of the Mutual Life Insurance Company of Hew York, of which corporation Maxson was the manager for Southern California. The check was given by Llewelyn in payment of the first year’s premium upon a life insurance policy to be issued by the company to him. By its terms the check was made payable upon a day…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Rowley v. . the Empire Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1867
  3. Butler v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Levy v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Riverisland Cold Storage, Inc. v. Fresno-Madera Production Credit Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Dyke v. ZaiserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Mooney v. CyriacksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Lyon v. United ModernsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  5. American Surety Co. v. HeiseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API