Muller v. Palmer
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
Action to recover three hundred dollars, with interest, paid to defendants on a contract for .the sale of certain real estate, described in the complaint.
Defendants had judgment, from which plaintiff has -appealed.
The case was submitted upon an agreed statement of facts, which shows that in July, 1896, after a personal inspection of the property, the plaintiff .entered into a written contract with the defendants, by which plaintiff agreed to purchase, and the defendants to sell to him, the lands described in the complaint for the sum of $2,025, of which sum three hundred dollars was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Turner v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Sheehy v. MilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Peckham v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Reynolds v. BorelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Southern Pac. R. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Howe v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Harris v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Howe v. CoatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Leiter v. HandelsmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Tracy v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.