Andrew v. Bankers & Shippers Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
LUCAS, J., pro tem.
This is an action based upon alleged fraud and deceit. Archibald Andrew, plaintiff in the court below, sought therein to recover the sum of $14,594 paid by him to one E. A. Shouse for eleven automobile sale contracts which plaintiff claims he was induced to purchase by reason of the fraudulent statements, misrepresentations and deceit of the defendants. The contracts were later found to be fictitious and of no value.
At the trial of the cause, after plaintiff had rested, the defendant company moved for a nonsuit; the motion was granted and judgment entered accordingly,…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Christiansen v. RoddyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Graham v. EllmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Adkins v. WyckoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Benner v. HooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.