Legal Opinion
Hanson v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 19, 1988No. C2-87-2226PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
Appellant Howard D. Hanson brought this declaratory judgment action against respondent Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company (“Grinnell”) seeking benefits under the terms of an automobile insurance policy. This appeal is from a grant of summary judgment to Grinnell. We affirm.
FACTS
The facts are not in dispute. The accident in this case occurred in October 1983 when Hanson was hunting in Wyoming with friends. The party had driven to Wyoming in Hanson’s pickup truck, which carried an attached eight-foot camper.
On October 15, Hanson pulled off the road and set up camp by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Haagenson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Continental Western Insurance Co. v. KlugSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Associated Independent Dealers, Inc. v. Mutual Service Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Tlougan v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- National Family Insurance Co. v. BoyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mid-Century Insurance Co. of Texas v. LindseyTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Garrison v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
- Garrison v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. StropeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Kemmerer v. State Farm Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.