Legal Opinion

Olney v. Cavell

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 24, 1934No. Civ. No. 7810PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, J., pro tem.

Action by plaintiffs to recover damages from defendant physician for alleged malpractice in treating a child of plaintiffs. Defendant denied all material allegations of the complaint except that of the death of such child, and set up as a bar to the action a judgment for $75 in his favor and against plaintiffs for the reasonable value of the services rendered by him in treating the child. Such judgment was entered on the verdict of a jury in the justice’s court of Gardena township, and in their answer filed in said court plaintiffs here interposed the defense that said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hesler v. California Hospital Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  2. In Re Estate of BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Elm v. Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co.California Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Henderson v. MigliettaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Minnis v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brunswig Drug Co. v. SpringerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Hardy v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Denio v. City of Huntington BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Shannon v. General Petroleum Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API