In Re Estate of Bell
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco directing payments to the widow o£ a deceased person on her family allowance. J. Y. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. James M. Allen, Drown, Leicester & Drown, Garret W. McEnerney, W. B. Bosley, John S. Drum, and Maurice Y. Samuels, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
This is an appeal by some of the creditors of the estate of Thomas Bell, deceased, from an order of the probate court entered in said estate on February 24, 1905, nunc pro tunc as of May 1, 1894, directing that a family allowance óf two thousand dollars a month continue to be paid from June 17, 1893, to Teresa Bell as widow of said deceased till the further order of the court, and from a judgment and order that a balance due her under said nunc pro tunc order of $32,665.80 be paid her from the estate of said deceased.
A clearer understanding of the point involved in this appeal may be had by a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Gray v. DoughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Colton v. OnderdonkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Garwood v. GarwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Harris v. HarrisNew York Supreme Court · 1861
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SchendelSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Panos v. Great Western Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Empire Star Mines Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Keith v. Willers Truck ServiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.