Elm v. Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
Appeal by defendants from judgment for plaintiffs in an action for specific performance of a contract to convey real property. Plaintiffs alleged that they had paid in full for said property and were entitled to a conveyance thereof from defendants. Defendants admitted the contract and part payment of the purchase price, but denied that the balance of said price, amounting to some $640, had been paid. Upon the trial plaintiffs introduced in evidence the entire transcript of the record in a prior action brought by them in the federal court against defendant lands company for damages for fraud…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Price v. Sixth District Agricultural Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Bingham v. KearneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sutphin v. SpeikCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. McLaughlin Land & Livestock Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- English v. EnglishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Brunswig Drug Co. v. SpringerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Nevada Land Inv. Corp. v. SistrunkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.