Legal Opinion

Denio v. City of Huntington Beach

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 9, 1946No. Civ. 3408PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBabnabd, P. J.

The defendant appeals from a judgment awarding the plaintiffs $19,718.83 as attorney fees under a contract of employment calling for the payment of percentages of certain royalties received by the defendant.

This action involves the same contract and the same general facts as those in Denio v. City of Huntington Beach, 22 Cal.2d 580 [140 P.2d 392, 149 A.L.R. 320]. The facts are rather fully stated in the opinion in that ease and need not be repeated here. It was there held that the contract of employment was valid and binding upon the defendant city, that the plaintiffs were wrongfully…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Panos v. Great Western Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Sutphin v. SpeikCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Stark v. CokerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Price v. Sixth District Agricultural Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Todhunter v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Estate of HughesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Estate of HiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. M. H. Golden Construction Co. v. El Centro Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Harpole v. Conrad N. Hilton FoundationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API