Legal Opinion

Hardy v. Rosenthal

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 26, 1934No. Civ. 1481PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

Plaintiff recovered judgment against defendant for damages resulting from a collision between a loaded gasoline truck and trailer, driven by Jessie W. Nicholson, an employee of plaintiff, and an automobile driven by defendant. The sole question to be decided here is whether a prior judgment in favor of the plaintiffs in an action brought by Emil Stoffel and Carnation Stoffel against Jessie W. Nicholson, H. J. Hardy and T. Rosenthal, is a bar to a recovery by the plaintiff in the instant case.

This case comes before us on the judgment roll, with the pleadings, verdict and judgment in the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Todhunter v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Estate of ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Horton v. GoodenoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Lamb v. WahlenmaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Simodejka v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Truck Insurance Exchange v. TorresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Allen v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Byrum v. Ames and Webb, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1955
  5. Atherley v. MacDonald, Young & Nelson, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API