Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Miglietta

California Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1928No. Docket No. L.A. 8641PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

An extended opinion does not seem to be required in the determination of this appeal as the plea of res judicata must be sustained and the action dismissed.

Plaintiffs, as the owners of certain real property, executed a note and deed of trust thereon to the defendant, who thereafter, upon due and regular proceedings had, caused the said, trust to be foreclosed and the premises sold, de fendant becoming the purchaser at such sale. Thereafter he brought an action against the present plaintiffs for possession of said property, then in the possession of plaintiffs. Plaintiffs here answered,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Price v. Sixth District Agricultural Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Baar v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Universal Milk Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Dobbins v. Title Guarantee & Tr. Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Hall v. CoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Malvaney v. YagerMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Hamilton v. CarpenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Hardy v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API