State v. Fetch
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Jeffrey Fetch appeals from a criminal judgment entered on a conditional plea of guilty to driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor, reserving his right to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Fetch argues the results of his blood test must be suppressed because he did not voluntarily consent to the blood draw. Because there is sufficient competent evidence to support the court’s decision that Fetch voluntarily consented to the blood test, we affirm the judgment.
I
[¶ 2] On August 3, 2018, Trooper Derek Arndt of the Highway…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Lund v. HjelleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- McCoy v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Grosgebauer v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. BirchfieldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Beylund v. LeviNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. ModlinNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. FleckensteinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. NagelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.