Legal Opinion

Missouri v. McNeely

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 17, 2013No. 11-1425PublishedCited by 1,282 opinions

1Judgment of the CourtJustice Sotomayor

In Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757 , 86 S.Ct. 1826 , 16 L.Ed.2d 908 (1966), this Court upheld a warrantless blood test of an individual arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol because the officer "might reasonably have believed that he was confronted with an emergency, in which the delay necessary to obtain a warrant, under the circumstances, threatened the destruction of evidence." Id., at 770 , 86 S.Ct. 1826 (internal quotation marks omitted). The question presented here is whether the natural metabolization of alcohol in the bloodstream presents a per se exigency that…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,282 opinions

  1. Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. Riley v. Cal. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Maryland v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Shari Guertin v. State of Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  5. Brokers' Choice of America, Inc. v. NBC Universal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014

1,277 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API