Legal Opinion
McCoy v. North Dakota Department of Transportation
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 24, 2014No. 20130300PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Ronald Dale McCoy appeals from a district court judgment affirming a Department of Transportation decision suspending his driving privileges for 180 days. We affirm because McCoy consented to take the chemical breath test given by the law enforcement officer and McCoy’s constitutional rights were not violated as a matter of law by North Dakota’s implied consent law.
I
[¶ 2] In March 2013, a Stark County sheriffs deputy stopped a vehicle that appeared to not have a light illuminating the license plate. The vehicle was driven by McCoy. While speaking with McCoy, the deputy…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- State v. BirchfieldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Beylund v. LeviNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. BoehmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.