Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 2014No. 20130398PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEVERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Joseph Smith appeals from a district court criminal judgment and conviction entered on a conditional plea of guilty for driving under the influence of an intoxicating liquor (“DUI”), in violation of N.D.C.C. § 39-08-01, a class B misdemeanor. Smith argues the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence that he claims was obtained in violation of Missouri v. McNeely, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 1552, 185 L.Ed.2d 696 (2013), and his constitutional rights under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and Article I, Section *6018 of the North Dakota…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  4. State v. MitzelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. McCoy v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. State of Iowa v. Dale Dean Pettijohn Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  3. State v. BirchfieldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Beylund v. LeviNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. O'ConnorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API