Legal Opinion

Beylund v. Levi

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 2015No. 20140133PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEVERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Steve Michael Beylund appeals from a district court judgment affirming a Department of Transportation decision suspending his driving privileges for two years. We affirm concluding Beylund voluntarily consented to the chemical blood test administered by the police officer, and the criminal refusal statute does not violate Beylund’s right under the Fourth Amendment or N.D. Const, art. I, § 8, nor does it violate the Fourth Amendment under the doctrine of unconstitutional conditions. We decline to address Beylund’s argument regarding the legality of the stop because the…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. Beylund v. LeviNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State v. HelmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State v. WilliamsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Koehly v. LeviNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API