Legal Opinion

State v. Modlin

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 2015No. S-14-590PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

- 660 - Nebraska A dvance Sheets 291 Nebraska R eports STATE v. MODLIN Cite as

291 Neb. 660

State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Nathan A. Modlin, appellant. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed August 21, 2015. No. S-14-590. 1. Constitutional Law: Search and Seizure: Motions to Suppress: Appeal and Error. In reviewing a trial court’s ruling on a motion to sup- press evidence based on a claimed violation of the Fourth Amendment, an appellate court applies a two-part standard of review. Regarding historical facts, an appellate court reviews the trial court’s findings for clear error. But whether those facts trigger…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Winston v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Elliott v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  2. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Myers, D.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. State of Tennessee v. Corrin Kathleen ReynoldsTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State of Iowa v. Dale Dean Pettijohn Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  5. Kendrick v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API