Huster v. Wynn
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the Probate Court of Kay County; before Robert A. Neff, Probate Judge. Action by J. W. Wynn against Fred Huster. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
Burford, C. J.:
This was an action by Wynn against Huster in the probate court of Kay county to recover the value of certain property, which it was alleged that Huster had unlawfully converted. There was a trial by jury, and verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, Wynn, for the sum of $400.
The only question presented by the record and briefs is whether the trial court erred in overrruling the defendant’s motion for new trial on the grounds of newly-discovered evidence, and for the reason that the defendant was unable to be present during all the time the cause was being…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sexton v. LambSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
- State v. StickneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
- Clark v. NormanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
- Parker v. BatesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hobbs v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Vickers v. Philip Carey Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Eisminger v. BemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Roeser v. PeaseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- McCants v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.