Legal Opinion

Eisminger v. Beman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 14, 1912No. 1813PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Error from District Court, Kay County; W. M. Bowles, Judge. Action by Oscar S. Benian against James A. Eisminger. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

AMES, C.

The plaintiff sued the defendant for $10,000, damages for alienating the affections of his wife. The case was tried to a jury, resulting in a verdict for $400. The first error assigned is that the court erred in overruling the defendant’s motion to require the plaintiff to make his petition more definite and certain. The petition alleged that the defendant frequently gave to the plaintiff’s wife money, that he made frequent trips to the farm upon which the plaintiff was residing, and that he, by these and other ways, alienated the affections of the plaintiff’s wife.

The…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Glaser v. GlaserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  3. McCabe & Steen Construction Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  4. McCants v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Sexton v. LambSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Norman v. LambertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Roeser v. PeaseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Alva Roller Mills v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Weleetka Light & Water Co. v. NorthropSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API