Legal Opinion

Roeser v. Pease

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 5, 1913No. 2078PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Error from District Court, Tulsa County; L. M. Foe, Judge. Action by Minnie A. Pease, plaintiff below, defendant in error, against W. II. Roeser, defendant below, plaintiff in error, to recover damages for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant-brings error.-

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

AMES, C.

Tbe plaintiff in this case was injured by being thrown from a carriage. The carriage was turned over by frightened horses running away. The horses took fright from defendant’s automobile on one of the streets of Tulsa. The plaintiff and her child were sitting on the rear seat of the carriage, which was being driven south on Boulder avenue close to the intersection of Second street. When the carriage was about 150 feet from the' corner, the automobile turned north on Boulder at a speed estimated by various wit-' nesses of from eight to twenty miles per hour. There was some…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Eisminger v. BemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Atlanta Consolidated Street Rwy. Co. v. BeauchampSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  4. Huster v. WynnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  5. Lookabaugh v. BowmakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. McUne v. FuquaWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Capps v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Flesner v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951
  5. Fulsom-Morris Coal & Mining Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API