Legal Opinion

State v. Stickney

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1894PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error from Nemaha District Court. From a conviction for burglary, the defendant Stickney appeals. The opinion states the material facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J.:

*3103 denial,unotoe’ *308Morgan A. Stickney was convicted of burglary, and the punishment adjudged was imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a term of five years. He appeals to *309this court, and the errors relied on for reversal are: The refusal of a continuance, the insufficiency of the evidence, and the denial of a motion for a new trial upon the ground of newly-discovered evidence. On December 13, 1893, in the nighttime, the store building of Daniel Birchfield, at Centraba, was broken open while the sheriff, Birchfield and several other…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. JansenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  2. Rapp v. KyleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  3. State v. LundSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Eisminger v. BemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. State v. HamrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  3. In re WellcomeMontana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. Shouquette v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API