State v. Stickney
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Nemaha District Court. From a conviction for burglary, the defendant Stickney appeals. The opinion states the material facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, J.:
*3103 denial,unotoe’ *308Morgan A. Stickney was convicted of burglary, and the punishment adjudged was imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a term of five years. He appeals to *309this court, and the errors relied on for reversal are: The refusal of a continuance, the insufficiency of the evidence, and the denial of a motion for a new trial upon the ground of newly-discovered evidence. On December 13, 1893, in the nighttime, the store building of Daniel Birchfield, at Centraba, was broken open while the sheriff, Birchfield and several other…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. JansenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
- Rapp v. KyleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- State v. LundSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
3Cited by17 opinions
- Eisminger v. BemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- State v. HamrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
- In re WellcomeMontana Supreme Court · 1899
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- Shouquette v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.